“The Distance between Stars: How the Range of Ratings Affects Willingness to Pay”

 

 

Steven Huff

Haas School of Business

University of California, Berkeley

Berkeley, CA 94720-1900

 

June 26, 2007

 

Abstract

 

This paper investigates whether the range of quality ratings can influence willingness to pay for the entire product category. In theory, product ratings (i.e., stars, diamonds, etc.) exist on an ordinal scale, so given that two rating systems have the same number of levels, there should be no difference in how these ratings systems affect willingness to pay. However, star ratings may appear as though they exist on an interval or ratio scale. If individuals operate on this premise, then their willingness to pay will be affected by the number of stars assigned to each product (i.e., WTP for five-star items in a menu containing three-, four-, and five-star products will differ from WTP for three-star items in the same menu when products are assigned one- , two-, to three stars). Thus, willingness to pay will be affected by the rating system used, despite that product quality remains unchanged.

 

In this study, 1-3 stars were assigned to five products in one treatment condition and 3-5 stars were assigned to the same products in another treatment condition. The experimental results suggest that willingness to pay for the higher-rated products increases even though the absolute qualities of the five products remain unchanged across the two treatment conditions.