Montblanc 146 reviewed by John (revised version)
This was my first serious fountain pen. I received this pen about 10 years ago while I was
working as a bankruptcy consultant. At the time, I was decrying the uniformity of dress
and action in my firm. I rebelled in various ways (none of which would get me fired). I
chose ridiculously colorful and highly patterned socks to go with my gray and blue suits.
I also chose splashy floral ties whenever possible. Choosing a big impractical fountain
pen seemed like the logical next step. My wife got the Montblanc for me for my birthday
shortly after we were married. It was easily the most expensive gift she had given me up
to that point and it was clear that it meant a lot to her that I enjoyed this pen.
Of course, having very little experience with fountain pens, working with a balky Montblanc
s not an introduction I'd advise a beginner to undertake. Indeed, the pen seriously put my
love to the test. On being completely filled (with the recommended Montblanc black ink --
yuck), the pen had a bad habit of sweating ink all over the section and the inside of the
cap; thereby creating the dreaded Montblanc ink bomb. There were about a half dozen times
(including in a meeting with an important client) where I suffered the ill effects of
this. The pen was also a lousy flier. The probability of an ink bomb following flight was
about 100%.
It turned out that there was an easy fix for this problem. At some point I switched from
Montblanc to Waterman ink (mostly because I thought it was nicer) and that completely
solved the problem. For seven years, the pen has been ink bomb free!
Although others have talked about the fragility of Montblanc pens, I have not found that
to be the case. My pen has been dropped more times than I'd care to remember with no
damage to the cap, barrel, or section. There was, however, a disastrous incident where the
pen nose dived off the desk and into a plastic rug protector thing. This shattered a part
of the feed and tore off one of the tines of the nib. Essentially, this rendered the nib a
total loss and I had my good friends at Montblanc replace it (for $150 -- ouch!)
The new nib turned out to be smoother and wetter than the original. Indeed, it was so wet
that I did some very minor tweaking to dry it out. This pen is the smoothest writer in my
stable at this point. There is practically no friction at all in writing. The downside,
however, is that the wetness of the line makes a mess on any but high quality paper. At
this point, I use the pen exclusively for entries in my Clairefontaine journal - where it
is very much in its element.
The body of the pen is the classic Montblanc style. In all physical respects, length,
width, and weight, the 146 is close to the Pelikan M800 (although more tapered and
aerodynamic). The weight is perfect for me -- I have never been excessively fatigued from
writing with this pen. Even after ten years of more or less daily use, the "precious
resin" is as lustrous and beautiful as it was the day I opened it as a gift.
To sum up, the pen, while quite expensive, is really attractive and of extremely high
quality. Amazingly, it's become much better than when I first got it. The nib is smoother,
it's less balky in feeding ink. It's very reliable-- no skips, immediate starts, and so
on. I'm not sure that I'd buy it for myself because of the price, but I'm really happy my
wife gave it to me. Plus, every time I use it, I think of her -- which is also nice.
Montblanc Writer's Series:
Marcel Proust reviewed by John
As a rule, I don't buy limited edition pens. I have
two reasons for this. First, I don't really see the point of fountain pens
as an investment compared to other investment instruments. Although I have
no data to support this, I would conjecture that investing in stocks over
the long haul yields a consistently higher return probably with less risk
and is certainly a more liquid investment instrument. Second, I think the
whole point of owning a pen is to write with it. Limited editions are
antithetical to this in two ways. First, many are not designed to be
comfortable or even useful as writers. Second, writing with (or even opening
the box of) a limited edition pen causes its value to drop on resale if
you're buying it as an investment. To me, it's a sad thing that you should
an item which is supposed to be useful only to find that you destroy a part
of its investment value by putting to the service for which it is presumably
designed.
Nonetheless, I'm happy to borrow
limited edition pens from anyone caring to lend them to me. This is how I
got to test-drive the Proust.
To be fair, I think the Writer's Series by Montblanc
is a lot less guilty of making pens that are useless as writers than many
other limited editions are (think Delta or expecially Krone). The Proust is
well balanced and very pleasant to use. While the nib design is unique to
the pen (it has an hourglass inscribed in it as well as the usual "4810"
designation of all Montblancs), it seems to be the same basic nib used in
the standard Montblanc 146. The version I have is in extra-fine width and
executes nicely, producing reasonable inkflow for such a narrow writing
line.
The body of the pen octagonal with panels of
attractive guilloche (I think that's the design term) alternating with swirl
designs. The panels are executed in sterling silver with a black background.
Perhaps the most attention-getting feature of the pen is the cap, which is
oversized and adorned with the usual Montblanc snowflake executed in mother
of pearl. When I first saw the cap, I figured that the pen would be poorly
balanced owing to the weight of the cap when posted. This proves not to be
the case. The pen is remarkably well balanced with the cap posted. I assume
that Montblanc pulled off this trick by balancing the metal in the body of
the pen with that in the cap. This, to me, was the most impressive part of
the pen.
Bottom line: I still wouldn't buy one of these, but I
do admire the attractiveness and craft that went into creating it. In the
category of limited editions, this is indeed a "Writer's" pen.
Submit your own review -- email it to
jmorgan@gmail.com
|