Waterman Hemisphere reviewed by Iain Ilich
I’d used a wide range of cheap fountain pens throughout my university
career, but had never been able to afford any sort of nice, well-built pen.
My $10 NoNonsense served me well during many hurried exams, and never broke
down at critical times. Still, after I finished my degree, I figured it was
time to treat myself with a pen that cost more than $20.
On a trip to Oxford, I picked up a Waterman Hemisphere at a local pen
shop, which seemed to fit both my budget and taste in design. Things started
out reasonably well. The nib was nice and smooth, though a tad broad for a
medium, and the ink flow was acceptable. After a few pages, however, the pen
started to act up. It would skip on a large number of down strokes, and I’d
have to go back to fix the missing bits. I tried several inks, and even
tried to change my writing style, but none had any effect on the
now-frequent skipping.
Frustrated, I phoned Waterman for help, where I ended up talking to a
grumpy customer service rep. They assured me that even though they hadn’t
seen it, there was nothing wrong with my pen (they’re all factory-tested,
after all), and that if I wanted them to take a look at it, they would apply
a service charge. Their Lifetime Warranty, which was part of what drew me to
a Waterman pen in the first place, was apparently rather limited.
I eventually got them to replace the nib, which had separated from the
feed. They didn’t charge me for the replacement, which I’ll give them credit
for. But, after filling it back up again, it’s only marginally better than
it was before.
The frustrating part is that, when it comes down to reliability, my
NoNonsense is still a better pen. The Hemisphere skips, while my trusty old
NoNonsense doesn’t. The Hemisphere is picky about what paper I use, whereas
the NoNonsense will write well on almost anything.
In short, I shouldn’t have to put up with the pickiness of the
Hemisphere. There are better pens out there for the price.
Waterman Liason reviewed
by James R. Harris
I was in New Orleans awhile back for a Geek conference
and I walked
into the only fountain pen store in the French Quarter and I asked for a
"cheap broad." I'm always looking for a cheap broad point pen.
Unlike
most fountain pen users I like the crayon-like stroke of a broad
tip. (Perhaps it has something to do with my quirky, deadpan prose one
critic
said I had). Anyway, mediums just don't cut it with me. Anyway, the tall,
stately blonde woman laughed and said, "Well, there's plenty of those
right
out on the street there."
There wasn't a cheap anything in that store, but it was a nice store.
I bought some French ink and left. I walked back to my hotel room and
loaded the silky, shiny French ink into the greatest pen I have ever
owned:
The Waterman Liaison. Then I went down to the Community Coffee shop, sat
in a corner next to a couple of drunks, and put a glorious broad right on
top of the first page of a brand new 70 count spiral-ring notebook. That
pen has written at least two hundred pages of my latest novel all by
itself (sometimes when I get up to go to the bathroom, it just takes off
by
itself).
I love everything about the Liaison. It's made out of ebonite and
smells like the inside of a '67 Camaro when you put it up to your nose.
It's heavy and fat and the tip is damn elegant. (I also use a 21 inch pool
stick, by the way- There maybe some compensation thing going on there but
I
won't comment on that.)
The Liaison is orange. It cost $238 through Swisher. Pricey, but
worth it. Before that I was writing with a Phileas, which is a damn good
pen also. The body did crack on me but I sent it back to the factory and
they sent me another one.
I have, 400 pages later, tried to use a few other pens so that I keep
the Liaison from getting dropped or lost by my clumsiness. So I use a Lamy
Safari and it puts the ink down nicely too and only cost me 40 bucks at
Seattle Pen Company when I was there for another Geek fest. I also have a
Waterman Carene which leaks and occasionally writes like a roofing nail.
Waterman Hemisphere
by Klyment Tan
I have used the Waterman Hemisphere as my writing instrument of choice
for the last seven months and have been very satisfied.
It is remarkably reliable and I have never had problems with any part of
the pen or the ink converter. After filling, it takes maybe three or four
lines of handwriting to clear off the excess ink from the metal part of the
nib and even after a harsh click-close, minimal quantities of ink splash out
of the groove running to the tip from where a breather hole would normally
be on the nib and there will never be enough splashing to leave any excess
ink in the cap which could contaminate the handling area of the pen to dirty
your fingers.
Writing with the pen is very enjoyable. I purchased the pen new and when
I first used it, writing was scratchy and sometimes the ink skipped. But
after roughly ten pages of writing, the pen seemed to have adapted to its
new owner and behaves predictably. The lines are smooth and even with cheap
paper and inexpensive Parker ink, feathering is not visible without
extensive inspection under hard light. The nib seems to be the right
flexibility, not too harsh and not too forgiving. The pen glides almost as
though it senses your next stroke and moves without resistance. I have one
complaint of the writing, though: this medium nib produces a line that is
just a tad too thick for my liking. I have tried a Sheaffer fountain pen
with a medium nib and found that nib to produce a notably finer line than
the Hemisphere. If only it were easier to find replacement nibs for this
pen.
As for aesthetics, the brass-based, lacquer covered pen is beautiful to
behold. The gold plated trim accentuates my black pen with a modern, but
traditional appeal. The oblique top of the cap and the clip with a cut-out
along its length help add character to this fine piece. I use the pen a lot
and I am not extremely careful with my pens so the gold has started to show
signs of wear . . . mostly just scratches. The lacquer seems to resist
scratches but there is some noticeable wear on it, too.
Waterman Phileas reviewed by John
The Waterman Phileas is an entry level pen. For the price (pay no more than
$40) it is attractive in a conservative way and has an unusually nice
two-toned nib. The pen itself is reliable and again reasonably good
considering the price. My main complaint is that the nibs run unusually
thick. Thus, an M nib is pretty much a paintbrush. Although Waterman will
switch nibs for free, I would imagine a new user would find the unexpected
thickness of the line somewhat annoying. The Phileas also has the advantage
that its cap pulls off rather than unscrews. For users unused to fountain
pens, the habit of pulling a cap can be hard to break, so this is a nice
feature.
For more on the Phileas, visit the
Beginner's Guide section of the site.
Waterman L'Etalon
reviewed by Kit
When I tried this in the shop I was very impressed with the
smoothness of it. It's a fairly fat and heavy pen in comparison to what I
am used to. The feel of the grip is very satisfying in your hand even
though it is just a smooth tapered cylinder. The workmanship is beautiful.
The cap clips into place with a small sprung brass button and the pen is
obviously mainly made of brass. The (18K) nib has a scroll shape
on each side, and the tip glides across the paper like butter across a hot
pan.
I originally bought this to use in my right hand. After a
while I started to find that the pen tended to skip on the first stroke
and after writing for a page or so. This was much worse on heavier paper
or with thick Omas ink. It became so annoying that I gave up writing with
it. I picked it up a week later and tried it in my left hand (something I
would not normally have thought of because I tend to like very light pens
when I'm writing lefthanded). It is an absolute joy to write with
lefthanded (for me). I think the tip is very round, (maybe too much so
causing it to skip if I'm not careful) and it suits a fairly fixed hand
position. It is now my favourite left hand pen.
The style of line is nothing special. It is a medium nib.
At an odd angle you get a slightly italic feel to your strokes, but at
this angle it is more likely to skip. At the angle at which it writes best
for me the line is very flat and even and boring, but despite this it is
now so enjoyable to write with I don't care.
Waterman Edson reviewed
by Steve Cleary
First let me start by saying that at
47 years of age I have always been interested in and used fountain pens.
However I have never gone beyond a sort of passive interest and until
recently the most expensive pen I owned was a Parker Sonnet.
The Edson arrived in an elegant blue
faux leather box with resplendent gold Waterman emblem on its lid. Once
opened I found it contained clear instructions and 2 sets of cartridges,
black and blue and a converter that exactly matches the colour of the
barrel, talk about attention to detail. The pen itself is absolutely
beautiful with a translucent deep blue barrel and gold coloured cap with
articulated clip. Despite having small hands and having read several
articles, which suggested this size of pen would be too large for me I find
it a joy to hold and use. The pen is heavy, the cap being almost as heavy as
the pen itself, but I have not found the pen tiring to use because of its
perfect balance. I prefer to use the pen with the cap posted, which again
would suggest (from articles read) that the pen is not too large for my
hand. The nib, which I believe is regarded as firm, is as smooth as silk and
I have yet to try anything that comes close despite trying every pen in
every shop in a 40 mile radius before settling on the Edson. To me it gives
my writing plenty of character and line variation, but as stated my
experience is limited.
At a UK recommended retail price of
£625 this pen is expensive, I got mine from Christian Fricke at a fraction
of that price, but such is a measure of the pen that I would still be more
than happy with it had I paid full UK retail. Don’t tell Christian :o)
This is a pen that is great for
everything from signatures to writing long essays
Overall I would give this pen 100%
and it would appear that I have bought a top quality pen that also happens
to suit me perfectly. I hope that I shall be as lucky with my future
purchases, but doubt it.
Waterman
Edson reviewed by Michael Picerno
This is the first "real" fountain pen I bought for myself
several years ago.
I was impressed by its looks, its heft and the snap on cap. I use a pen over
a dozen times a day to sign my name, take notes, initial memos, etc, and the
screw on cap most pens feature seemed to be too awkward for me. First off,
this pen is absolutely gorgeous. I own over a dozen expensive pens - OMAS,
Parker, Montegrappa, Montblanc - and nothing gets the comments and
compliments that this thing does. I got it with a fine point and its
absolutely perfect - smooth wet line, not a hint of scratchiness on the nib,
etc. The nib is sort of inlaid like Sheaffers, and its pretty firm so you
do not get the line variation as you might get in an OMAS pen. I've used it
on an almost daily basis now and have never had a single problem with it.
It
travels well on planes without a hint of ink loss or leakage. It is large
and heavy (I think its solid brass under the blue resin) and some may not
like the heft if you're using it all day. It comes in a very fancy leather
covered box, uses standard cartridges and comes with a converter which I
have never used. Its not cheap but as long as you don't lose the thing it
will last you a lifetime I bet.
Waterman Expert
reviewed by John
About eight years ago, I purchased a Waterman expert for my wife. The body
of the Expert is a kind of glossy finish (but not lacquer) over brass. The
Expert is slightly shorter and less wide than the M800 but is of similar
weight. One disadvantage of this finish is that it scratches fairly easily
and, indeed, this Expert is decidedly duller than it was when new. The nib
is a very simple 2-tone gold. There is no pattern or anything else on the
nib. The filling system is cartridge/converter. The pen is quite reliable
and writes smoothly but without an especially wet line in the medium nib of
my wife's pen. Also, the nib has very little flex so line variation is at a
minimum. All in all, this pen is solid if unspectacular in all dimensions.
Waterman Opera
reviewed by John
The Waterman Opera is a flat-out gorgeous pen. It is a
version of the Man 100 line, which was Waterman's flagship in the 1980s, but
this version is dressed up to look like black chased hard rubber. The
construction is brass with a crosshatched overlay of semi-glossy black over
it. The design is really evocative of Waterman pens from the first half of
the 20th century. The retro quality of the design carries through to the
nib, which is two-tone gold with the Waterman Ideal globe logo featuring
prominently. The pen is long and somewhat thick (about like a Pelikan M600).
All of the brass makes it somewhat heavy as well. The pen, like all
Watermans, is a cartridge/converter system.
The version I have is a fine nib, which glides
smoothly across the surface of the paper despite producing a nice crisp
narrow line. My only objection to the writing experience is that the pen
runs a bit on the lean side in terms of ink flow, which makes it unsuitable
for less saturated inks like Sheaffer Skrip. I'd rather it be a bit more
generous. I sent it to Janesville to correct this, but without any luck. The
pen came back approximately the same as when I sent it.
Another problem with the pen is its tendency to bleed
ink on the nib if it is not thoroughly "wicked" upon filling. This problem
is pretty much unsolvable if using Private Reserve inks.
The key problem I have with the pen is in ergonomics.
The combination of the weight and thickness of the pen causes my hand to
fatigue after a very short time. This, combined with the dry writing, has
caused this pen to be used less than many others that are not nearly so
gorgeous. Bottom line: A disappointment.
Submit your own review -- email it to
jmorgan@gmail.com
|