Philip E. Tetlock

subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link
subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link
subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link
subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link
subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link
subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link
subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link
subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link

1999-2000

Accounting for the effects of accountabilityLerner, J. & Tetlock, P.E. (1999).  Accounting for the effects of accountability.  Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.

 

Mass public decisions on going to war: A cognitive-interactionist framework. Hermann, R., Tetlock, P.E., & Visser, P. (1999).  Mass public decisions on going to war:  A cognitive-interactionist framework.  American Political Science Review, 93. 553-574. 

 

Rage and reason:  The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor.Goldberg, J. H., Lerner, J. S. & Tetlock, P. E. (1999).  Rage and reason:  The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor.  European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 781-795.

 

Accountability and close-call counterfactuals:  The loser who almost won and the winner who almost lost. Markman, K. D., & Tetlock, P. E.  (2000).  Accountability and close-call counterfactuals:  The loser who almost won and the winner who almost lost.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1213-1224.

 

Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the ideological beholder? Tetlock, P.E. (2000). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the ideological beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 293-326. Reprinted in L. Thompson (ed.), The social psychology of organizational behavior. (pp. 384-406). New York: Taylor and Francis Books. Reprinted in M. Bazerman (ed), The International Library of critical writings in business and management. Cheltenham: Elgar.

 

Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises.Green, M., Visser, P., & Tetlock, P.E. (2000).  Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin., 26, 1380-1392.

 

Coping with trade-offs:  Psychological constraints and political implications.  Tetlock, P.E. (2000).  Coping with trade-offs:  Psychological constraints and political implications.  In S. Lupia, M. McCubbins, & S. Popkin (eds.), Political reasoning and choice.  Berkeley:  University of California Press.

 

Human nature and world politics:  Cognition, influence, and identity.  Tetlock, P. E. & Goldgeier, J. (2000).  Human nature and world politics:  Cognition, influence, and identity.  International Journal of Psychology, 35, 87-96.

 

I could not have known: Accountability, foreseeability, Markman, K. D., & Tetlock, P. E.  (2000).  I could not have known: Accountability, foreseeability, and counterfactual denials of responsibility.  British Journal of Social Psychology.

 

The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Tetlock, P.E., Kristel, O., Elson, B., Green, M., and Lerner, J (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853-870.

 

Thinking about Russia: Possible pasts and probable futures.  Tetlock, P. E. & Visser, P. (2000).  Thinking about Russia: Possible pasts and probable futures.  British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 173-196.

 

How Americans think about trade:  Resolving conflicts among money, power, and principles.  Herrmann, R., Tetlock, P. E., and Diascro, M.  (2001).  How Americans think about trade:  Resolving conflicts among money, power, and principles.  International Studies Quarterly, 45, 191-218.

 

The limits of fungibility: Relational schemata and the value of things. McGraw, A.P., & Tetlock, P.E. (November, 2001). The limits of fungibility: Relational schemata and the value of things. Society for Judgment and Decision Making; Orlando, FL.

 

Poking counterfactual holes in covering laws: Cognitive styles and historical reasoning. Tetlock, P.E. & Lebow, R.N. (2001). Poking counterfactual holes in covering laws: Cognitive styles and historical reasoning. American Political Science Review, 95, 829-843.

 

Psychology and international relations theory. Goldgeier, J. & Tetlock, P. E. (2001). Psychology and international relations theory.  In N. Polsby (ed.), Annual Review of Political Science, 2001, (volume 4).  Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Press.

 

Cognitive biases in path-dependent systems: Theory driven reasoning about plausible pasts and probable futures in world politics. Tetlock, P.E. (2002).  Cognitive biases in path-dependent systems: Theory driven reasoning about plausible pasts and probable futures in world politics.  In T. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, & D. Kahneman. (Eds.).  Inferences, heuristics and biases: New directions in judgment under uncertainty.  New York: Cambridge University Press.